TL;DR
This paper introduces DLED, a novel approach for open set face forgery detection that estimates uncertainty using dual-level evidence, effectively identifying new fake categories and outperforming existing methods.
Contribution
The paper formulates the open set face forgery detection problem and proposes DLED, which leverages spatial and frequency evidence for uncertainty estimation, achieving state-of-the-art results.
Findings
DLED surpasses baseline models by 20% on novel fake categories.
DLED performs competitively on binary real-vs-fake detection.
Comprehensive experiments validate DLED's effectiveness across diverse settings.
Abstract
The surge in face forgeries has increasingly undermined confidence in the authenticity of online content. As generation algorithms rapidly evolve, new fake categories will constantly emerge, severely challenging existing face forgery detection methods. Although face forgery detection has recently improved, current techniques remain largely confined to binary Real-vs-Fake classification or the recognition of known fake categories. Moreover, they fail to identify the emergence of entirely new forgery methods. In this work, we study the Open Set Face Forgery Detection (OSFFD) problem, which requires the detection model to identify novel fake categories. To enhance its real-world applicability, we reformulate the OSFFD problem and address it through uncertainty estimation. Specifically, we propose the Dual-Level Evidential face forgery Detection (DLED) approach, which estimates prediction…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
Strengths: - The motivation of this paper is clear and the authors chose a straightforward but effective method to achieve the goal. - The charts related to the experiments in the paper are relatively clear, and the organization of the charts is logical.
Weaknesses: - The paper directly applies EDL to uncertainty estimation in OSFFD, but fails to analyze the differences between the feature distribution of forged face images and the applicable scenarios of EDL. For example, does EDL produce excessive uncertainty estimation when dealing with forged samples with low evidence strength? This issue is not discussed, and the application of EDL lacks specific justification. - The paper mentions integrating a LoRA layer into the CLIP encoder, but it does
The paper is well organized and easy to follow. The proposed method outperforms previous approaches on DF40 and FF++ datasets.
- The significance of this work appears limited. Previous studies have extensively explored the generalizability of deepfake detectors against unseen forgeries and achieved impressive results. Moreover, existing deepfake attribution methods can already classify forgery types with high accuracy. The practical application and necessity of the proposed task remain unclear, rendering the overall contribution incremental. - The novelty of the proposed approach is limited. The integration of spatial
- This manuscript is well-structured and easy to follow.
- The uncertainty-estimation-based fusion strategy has already been discussed in [1] for deepfake detection, but the manuscript neither cites this work nor provides a comparison. - The analysis of uncertainty estimation is not sufficiently in-depth. As highlighted in the recent survey on EDL [2], Dirichlet-based uncertainty typically covers four representative scenarios, whereas the paper only presents the ideal “DC” (dominant & certain) case. To make the discussion more complete, the remaining
(S1) Timely and Well-Motivated Problem Formulation: The paper tackles a critical and forward-looking problem in digital media forensics. The reformulation of OSFFD is a significant strength. By removing the dependency on unlabeled novel-category data during training, the proposed setting is far more aligned with real-world scenarios where new forgery methods emerge without warning.1 This makes the research more impactful and applicable. Furthermore, the paper does an excellent job of distinguish
(W1) Overstated Novelty and Insufficient Justification of the "Improved Uncertainty Estimation": The paper presents the proposed uncertainty metric as a key contribution, but its novelty and superiority over other EDL formulations are not well-established. The proposed metric replaces the average evidence in the denominator of the standard uncertainty calculation with the maximum evidence, yielding an expression of the form $\hat{u} = 1 / \max\{\tilde{\alpha}_{1,...,K}\}$.1 While the authors cor
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Face recognition and analysis · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
