The DESI DR1 Peculiar Velocity Survey: growth rate measurements from the maximum likelihood fields method
Y. Lai, C. Howlett, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, A. J. Amsellem, J. Bautista, S. BenZvi, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, D. Brooks, A.Carr, T. Claybaugh, T. M. Davis, A. de la Macorra, P. Doel, K. Douglass, S. Ferraro, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gazta\~naga, G. Gutierrez, J. Guy

TL;DR
This paper measures the growth rate of cosmic structure using DESI DR1 peculiar velocity data with an improved algorithm, finding results consistent with the standard cosmological model and General Relativity.
Contribution
It introduces a computationally efficient maximum likelihood fields method applied to large peculiar velocity datasets, providing new growth rate constraints.
Findings
Measured $f\sigma_8$ at $z_{eff}=0.07$ as 0.450 ± 0.055, consistent with Planck + $\Lambda$CDM.
Achieved improved computational efficiency using JAX for large data processing.
Results support General Relativity and standard cosmological model within uncertainties.
Abstract
We present the constraint on the growth rate of structure from the combination of DESI DR1 BGS sample, Fundamental Plane, and Tully-Fisher peculiar velocity catalogues using the maximum likelihood fields method. The combined catalogue contains 415,523 galaxy redshifts and 76,616 peculiar velocity measurements. To handle the large amount of data in the DESI DR1 peculiar velocity catalogue, we significantly improve the computational efficiency by rewriting the algorithm with JAX. After removing outliers and Tully-Fisher galaxies that are affected by systematics, we find , consistent within with the power spectrum and correlation function analysis using the same dataset. Combining all three measurements with appropriate correlations, the consensus measurement is $f\sigma_8 (z_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.07) =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
