Does Head Pose Correction Improve Biometric Facial Recognition?
Justin Norman, Hany Farid

TL;DR
This study evaluates whether AI-driven head pose correction and image restoration techniques can enhance biometric facial recognition accuracy in challenging real-world conditions.
Contribution
It systematically assesses multiple restoration methods and identifies effective combinations that improve recognition performance.
Findings
Naive application of restoration techniques degrades accuracy.
Selective use of CFR-GAN and CodeFormer improves recognition results.
Different restoration methods have varying impacts on recognition performance.
Abstract
Biometric facial recognition models often demonstrate significant decreases in accuracy when processing real-world images, often characterized by poor quality, non-frontal subject poses, and subject occlusions. We investigate whether targeted, AI-driven, head-pose correction and image restoration can improve recognition accuracy. Using a model-agnostic, large-scale, forensic-evaluation pipeline, we assess the impact of three restoration approaches: 3D reconstruction (NextFace), 2D frontalization (CFR-GAN), and feature enhancement (CodeFormer). We find that naive application of these techniques substantially degrades facial recognition accuracy. However, we also find that selective application of CFR-GAN combined with CodeFormer yields meaningful improvements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
