The DREAMS Project: Disentangling the Impact of Halo-to-Halo Variance and Baryonic Feedback on Milky Way Dark Matter Density Profiles
Alex M. Garcia, Jonah C. Rose, Paul Torrey, Andrea Caputo, Mariangela Lisanti, Andrew B. Pace, Hongwan Liu, Abdelaziz Hussein, Haozhe Liu, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, John Barry, Ilem Leisher, Bel\'en Costanza, Jonathan Kho, Ethan Lilie, Jiaxuan Li, Niusha Ahvazi

TL;DR
This study uses the DREAMS simulation suite to analyze how baryonic feedback and halo-to-halo variance influence Milky Way dark matter density profiles, highlighting the dominance of intrinsic variance over feedback effects.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive quantification of the relative impacts of baryonic feedback and halo variance on dark matter profiles using a large suite of simulated halos.
Findings
Dark matter density profiles are largely insensitive to astrophysics and cosmology variations.
Halo-to-halo variance is the main source of scatter in density profiles.
Strong supernova winds can suppress galaxy formation, making halos nearly collisionless.
Abstract
In this work, we utilize a new suite of Milky Way-mass halos from the DREAMS Project, simulated with Cold Dark Matter (CDM), to quantify the influence of baryon feedback and intrinsic halo-to-halo variance on dark matter density profiles. Our suite of 1024 halos varies over supernova and black hole feedback parameters from the IllustrisTNG model, as well as variations in two cosmological parameters. We find that, for the DREAMS parameter variations, Milky Way-mass dark matter density profiles in the IllustrisTNG model are largely insensitive to astrophysics and cosmology variations, with the dominant source of scatter instead arising from halo-to-halo variance. However, most of the (comparatively minor) feedback-driven variations come from the changes to supernova prescriptions. By comparing to dark matter-only simulations, we find that the strongest supernova wind energies are so…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
