Alleviating Choice Supportive Bias in LLM with Reasoning Dependency Generation
Nan Zhuang, Wenshuo Wang, Lekai Qian, Yuxiao Wang, Boyu Cao, Qi Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel framework called Reasoning Dependency Generation (RDG) to mitigate choice-supportive bias in large language models by generating unbiased reasoning data for fine-tuning, significantly improving bias reduction while maintaining standard performance.
Contribution
The paper presents the first method to address cognitive biases in LLMs using RDG, which constructs balanced reasoning QA pairs to reduce choice-supportive bias through fine-tuning.
Findings
81.5% improvement in memory-based bias experiments
94.3% improvement in evaluation-based bias experiments
Maintains performance on standard benchmarks
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated that some Large Language Models exhibit choice-supportive bias (CSB) when performing evaluations, systematically favoring their chosen options and potentially compromising the objectivity of AI-assisted decision making. While existing debiasing approaches primarily target demographic and social biases, methods for addressing cognitive biases in LLMs remain largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first solution to address CSB through Reasoning Dependency Generation (RDG), a novel framework for generating unbiased reasoning data to mitigate choice-supportive bias through fine-tuning. RDG automatically constructs balanced reasoning QA pairs, explicitly (un)modeling the dependencies between choices, evidences, and justifications. Our approach is able to generate a large-scale dataset of QA pairs across domains, incorporating Contextual Dependency…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Text Readability and Simplification
