Revisiting Theory of Contrastive Learning for Domain Generalization
Ali Alvandi, Mina Rezaei

TL;DR
This paper extends the theoretical understanding of contrastive learning by providing new generalization bounds that account for both domain shift and the introduction of new label spaces, addressing real-world domain generalization challenges.
Contribution
It introduces novel theoretical bounds for contrastive learning that explicitly handle distributional shifts and new label spaces in downstream tasks.
Findings
Performance depends on statistical discrepancy between distributions.
Provides guarantees for classification with unseen class distributions.
Addresses both domain shift and new label spaces in theory.
Abstract
Contrastive learning is among the most popular and powerful approaches for self-supervised representation learning, where the goal is to map semantically similar samples close together while separating dissimilar ones in the latent space. Existing theoretical methods assume that downstream task classes are drawn from the same latent class distribution used during the pretraining phase. However, in real-world settings, downstream tasks may not only exhibit distributional shifts within the same label space but also introduce new or broader label spaces, leading to domain generalization challenges. In this work, we introduce novel generalization bounds that explicitly account for both types of mismatch: domain shift and domain generalization. Specifically, we analyze scenarios where downstream tasks either (i) draw classes from the same latent class space but with shifted distributions, or…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. Well-motivated extension: The paper addresses a genuine gap in contrastive learning theory. 2. Clean mathematical framework: The paper provides an elegant way to quantify distribution mismatch. The first-order Taylor expansion approach in Lemma 4.3 is technically sound.
1. Limited practical impact: No experiments showing whether minimizing the theoretical quantities leads to better downstream performance 2. Incremental technical contribution: The proof technique is a straightforward extension of Saunshi et al. (2019)
Overall, the paper demonstrates theoretical soundness. Its central claim that distributional mismatches introduce a quantifiable bias term in the generalization bound is well supported. The proofs are largely self-contained and presented with sufficient rigor, and the results hold consistently across multiple loss functions (hinge and logistic), which strengthens their generality. No major logical flaws or unjustified leaps were found. Other notable points are stated below. --Ambitious attempt
The work relies on idealized assumptions, such as access to latent class means and uniform downstream sampling, which may not hold in realistic settings as they agree in the end of Section 4. Lack of literature review: Although the paper builds directly upon and extends the framework of Saunshi et al. (2019), the authors do not clearly summarize that prior work or provide a comprehensive comparison with its results. This omission weakens the contextual grounding of their contribution. The ab
Thank you for your work, I have truly enjoyed reading the paper. Below, I have listed the strengths of this paper. - Realistic Assumptions in Contrastive Learning (CL) X Domain Generalization (DG): First and foremost, it is worth mentioning that the paper addresses an important, yet often overlooked issue in DG: the in-distribution assumption. I believe this is the largest, and most important contribution of this paper. - Technical Correctness: The derivations proposed in the paper are sound a
While the paper has some strengths, it also has critical weaknesses. - Lack of empirical grounding: While the theoretical analysis is sound, there is a visible lack of experimental results. While I acknowledge that this paper's contributions derive in its theoretical aspects, the paper would benefit from even small-scale experiments. Frankly, this is my largest concern regarding the paper. Please refer to the following Questions section for potential experiments. - Partially novel, yet increme
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Face recognition and analysis · Face and Expression Recognition
