Assessment of Simulation-based Inference Methods for Stochastic Compartmental Models in Epidemiological Research
Vincent Wieland, Nils Wassmuth, Lorenzo Contento, Martin K\"uhn, Jan Hasenauer

TL;DR
This paper compares two Bayesian inference methods, Particle MCMC and Conditional Normalizing Flows, for stochastic epidemic models, demonstrating their effectiveness in parameter estimation and outbreak prediction.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of likelihood-free Bayesian inference techniques applied to stochastic compartmental models in epidemiology.
Findings
Both methods provide accurate inference in stochastic epidemic models.
The approaches are robust under real-world noisy and irregular data.
Code and datasets are publicly available for reproducibility.
Abstract
Global pandemics, such as the recent COVID-19 crisis, highlight the need for stochastic epidemic models that can capture the randomness inherent in the spread of disease. Such models must be accompanied by methods for estimating parameters in order to generate fast nowcasts and short-term forecasts that can inform public health decisions. This paper presents a comparison of two advanced Bayesian inference methods: 1) pseudo-marginal particle Markov chain Monte Carlo, using an unbiased likelihood estimate obtained by Particle Filter (PF), and 2) Conditional Normalizing Flows (CNF). We investigate their performance on three commonly used compartmental models: A classical Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS), a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model and a two-variant Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered (SEIR) model, complemented by an observation model that maps latent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
