Improved Mean Flows: On the Challenges of Fastforward Generative Models
Zhengyang Geng, Yiyang Lu, Zongze Wu, Eli Shechtman, J. Zico Kolter, Kaiming He

TL;DR
This paper introduces iMF, an improved MeanFlow framework for fastforward generative modeling, addressing training stability and guidance flexibility, achieving state-of-the-art results on ImageNet 256x256.
Contribution
Reformulates MeanFlow's training objective for stability and introduces explicit guidance conditioning, enabling flexible, high-quality single-evaluation image generation.
Findings
Achieves 1.72 FID on ImageNet 256x256 with 1-NFE.
Outperforms prior single-step methods without distillation.
Closes the gap with multi-step generative models.
Abstract
MeanFlow (MF) has recently been established as a framework for one-step generative modeling. However, its ``fastforward'' nature introduces key challenges in both the training objective and the guidance mechanism. First, the original MF's training target depends not only on the underlying ground-truth fields but also on the network itself. To address this issue, we recast the objective as a loss on the instantaneous velocity , re-parameterized by a network that predicts the average velocity . Our reformulation yields a more standard regression problem and improves the training stability. Second, the original MF fixes the classifier-free guidance scale during training, which sacrifices flexibility. We tackle this issue by formulating guidance as explicit conditioning variables, thereby retaining flexibility at test time. The diverse conditions are processed through in-context…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
