GRASP: Guided Residual Adapters with Sample-wise Partitioning

TL;DR

GRASP introduces a novel partitioning method with residual adapters to improve long-tail class performance in flow-matching transformers, significantly enhancing fidelity, diversity, and tail-class coverage.

Contribution

It proposes a static, sample-wise partitioning approach with residual adapters that improves long-tail class generation without altering the core flow-matching objective.

Findings

Reduces overall FID by up to 80%

Increases tail-class coverage by up to 44%

Outperforms alternative methods in medical and ImageNet-LT datasets

Abstract

Text-to-image flow matching transformers degrade sharply in long-tail settings: tail-class outputs collapse in fidelity and diversity, limiting their value as synthetic augmentation for rare conditions. We trace this to low head-versus-tail gradient alignment during fine-tuning, an optimization-level pathology that conditioning- and sampling-side interventions do not address. We propose GRASP (Guided Residual Adapters with Sample-wise Partitioning): a deterministic partition of the conditioning space, paired with group-specific residual adapters in the transformer feedforward layers, that leaves the flow-matching objective and the sampler untouched. In conditional flow matching, condition values index distinct sets of probability paths, so partitioning along the conditioning is the structurally correct factorization suitable as gradient alignment proxy. Because the partition is static, every tail sample is guaranteed to update its assigned expert, which bypasses extreme longtail failure modes. Crucially, GRASP is non-invasive and composable: on MIMIC-CXR-LT, combining GRASP with self-guided minority sampling at inference time yields the best all-labels IRS we observe, beyond either intervention alone. GRASP itself reduces overall FID by up to 80\% and lifts tail-class coverage by up to 44\% over full fine-tuning, learned-routing MoE, and minority guidance. Used as training data for a downstream DenseNet classifier on NIH-CXR-LT, GRASP synthetics significantly outperform every non-GRASP alternative on macro F1, match the macro F1 obtained from real training data, and yield nonzero F1 on $9$ of $13$ classes versus $3$ of $13$ from full fine-tuning. Results on ImageNet-LT confirm the mechanism is not tied to medical inductive bias.