Non-detection of FAST and Parkes follow-up observation for 27 Parkes discovered FRBs
Xuan Yang, Songbo Zhang, and Xuefeng Wu

TL;DR
This study conducted follow-up observations on 27 non-repeating FRBs from the Parkes database, finding no repeats and setting stringent upper limits on their repetition rates, indicating a likely homogeneous population with very low activity.
Contribution
It provides the first uniform, multi-telescope follow-up analysis of these FRBs, significantly tightening constraints on their repetition rates and suggesting low intrinsic activity.
Findings
No additional bursts detected from the 27 FRBs
Repetition rate upper limits are an order of magnitude stricter than previous studies
FRBs likely form a homogeneous population with low activity rates
Abstract
To investigate whether apparently non-repeating Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are truly one-off transients, we conducted systematic follow-up observations of 27 out of 81 non-repeating FRBs identified in the Parkes Transient Database. Using 59.0 hours of data from the Parkes Ultra-Wideband Low (UWL) receiver and 6.3 hours from the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) 19-beam receiver, we searched for repeated bursts from these sources. No additional bursts were detected from any of the 27 FRBs. Combining these non-detections with prior archival observations, we derived stringent upper limits on their repetition rates above 1 Jy under two statistical models: Poisson process constraints range from to , while Weibull process constraints range from to . These limits are approximately an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
