Linearized instability of Couette flow in stress-power law fluids
Krishna Kaushik Yanamundra (1), Lorenzo Fusi (2) ((1) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA, (2) Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica "U. Dini'', Universit\`a degli Studi di Firenze, 50134, Firenze, Italy)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the linear stability of Couette flow in stress-power law fluids, revealing stability depends on boundary conditions and the non-monotonic stress-strain relationship.
Contribution
It introduces a thermodynamic-based constitutive model with non-convex dissipation potential and characterizes flow stability across different boundary conditions.
Findings
Ascending branches are unconditionally stable.
Descending branches are unconditionally unstable.
Stability depends on whether traction is on an ascending or descending branch.
Abstract
This paper examines the linearized stability of plane Couette flow for stress-power law fluids, which exhibit non-monotonic stress-strain rate behavior. The constitutive model is derived from a thermodynamic framework using a non-convex rate of dissipation potential. Under velocity boundary conditions, the system may admit three steady-state solutions. Linearized stability analysis reveals that the two solutions on ascending constitutive branches are unconditionally stable, while the solution on the descending branch is unconditionally unstable. For mixed traction-velocity boundary conditions, the base state is unique. Stability depends solely on whether the prescribed traction lies on an ascending (stable) or descending (unstable) branch of the constitutive curve. The results demonstrate that flow stability in these complex fluids is fundamentally governed by both boundary conditions…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
