Difference-in-differences with stochastic policy shifts of a continuous treatment
Michael Jetsupphasuk, Chenwei Fang, Didong Li, Michael G. Hudgens

TL;DR
This paper develops methods to infer the effects of stochastic policy shifts on continuous treatments within difference-in-differences designs, enabling analysis of policy impacts where treatments are manipulated probabilistically.
Contribution
It introduces a new causal estimand for stochastic policies, proposes a general identification framework, and develops a double/debiased machine learning estimator for the exponential tilt policy.
Findings
The estimator is root-n consistent and asymptotically normal.
Applied to study hydraulic fracturing's impact on employment and income.
Framework accommodates nonparametric nuisance function estimation.
Abstract
Treatment effects of stochastic policy shifts quantify differences in outcomes across counterfactual scenarios with varying treatment distributions. Stochastic policy shifts may be of interest in settings where it is unrealistic or infeasible to deterministically manipulate treatments. In this paper, methods are developed to draw inference about stochastic policy effects under difference-in-differences (DiD) designs with a continuous treatment. The proposed causal estimand is the expected effect of modifying the continuous dose distribution among the treated, i.e., those that received a non-zero dose. Several possible stochastic policies are discussed and a general framework for identification and estimation is proposed. One stochastic policy applicable to many settings is the exponential tilt, which increments the conditional density function of the continuous dose. For the exponential…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
