Self-organized vegetation patterns promote persistence of plant-pollinator mutualisms under environmental stress
Matheus Bongestab, David Pinto-Ramos, Ricardo Martinez-Garcia

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that self-organized spatial vegetation patterns can enhance the stability and persistence of plant-pollinator mutualisms under environmental stress by enabling coexistence at lower mutualistic strengths.
Contribution
It introduces a reaction-diffusion model showing how spatial pattern formation stabilizes mutualisms, especially in harsh environmental conditions, expanding ecological stability theory.
Findings
Pattern formation enables coexistence at lower mutualistic strengths.
Spatial patterns increase community stability under environmental stress.
Multistability between patterned and homogeneous states buffers population fluctuations.
Abstract
Mutualisms are key for structuring ecological communities, but they are sensitive to environmental change and fluctuations in population size. Consequently, how mutualisms achieve stability remains an open question in ecological theory. Motivated by previous results in competitive and predator-prey interactions, we hypothesize that self-organized pattern formation can act as a key stabilizing mechanism of mutualistic interactions. We test this hypothesis using a two-species reaction-diffusion model of a plant-pollinator system that incorporates non-local plant competition and local mutualistic interactions. We first perform a linear stability analysis to determine the conditions under which non-local competition can trigger vegetation pattern formation. We then compute the bifurcation diagrams for both spatial and homogeneous solutions and find that pattern formation enables coexistence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
