Decoding the Past: Explainable Machine Learning Models for Dating Historical Texts

TL;DR

This paper develops interpretable machine learning models using diverse linguistic features to accurately date historical texts across five centuries, providing insights into linguistic evolution and domain adaptation challenges.

Contribution

It introduces a multi-feature, tree-based approach for temporal text classification that outperforms baseline models and offers explainability through SHAP analysis.

Findings

Achieves 76.7% century-level accuracy and 26.1% decade-level accuracy.

Feature importance analysis highlights distance and lexical structure as most informative.

Cross-dataset evaluation shows domain adaptation challenges with accuracy dropping by 26.4%.

Abstract

Accurately dating historical texts is essential for organizing and interpreting cultural heritage collections. This article addresses temporal text classification using interpretable, feature-engineered tree-based machine learning models. We integrate five feature categories - compression-based, lexical structure, readability, neologism detection, and distance features - to predict the temporal origin of English texts spanning five centuries. Comparative analysis shows that these feature domains provide complementary temporal signals, with combined models outperforming any individual feature set. On a large-scale corpus, we achieve 76.7% accuracy for century-scale prediction and 26.1% for decade-scale classification, substantially above random baselines (20% and 2.3%). Under relaxed temporal precision, performance increases to 96.0% top-2 accuracy for centuries and 85.8% top-10 accuracy for decades. The final model exhibits strong ranking capabilities with AUCROC up to 94.8% and AUPRC up to 83.3%, and maintains controlled errors with mean absolute deviations of 27 years and 30 years, respectively. For authentication-style tasks, binary models around key thresholds (e.g., 1850-1900) reach 85-98% accuracy. Feature importance analysis identifies distance features and lexical structure as most informative, with compression-based features providing complementary signals. SHAP explainability reveals systematic linguistic evolution patterns, with the 19th century emerging as a pivot point across feature domains. Cross-dataset evaluation on Project Gutenberg highlights domain adaptation challenges, with accuracy dropping by 26.4 percentage points, yet the computational efficiency and interpretability of tree-based models still offer a scalable, explainable alternative to neural architectures.