Quantum Simulation of Ligand-like Molecules through Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization in Density Matrix Embedding Framework
Ashish Kumar Patra, Anurag K. S. V., Sai Shankar P., Ruchika Bhat, Raghavendra V., Rahul Maitra, and Jaiganesh G

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization within the Density Matrix Embedding Theory framework enables accurate quantum simulations of complex, low-symmetry molecules on current hardware, emphasizing entanglement-aware strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel SQD-based approach combined with DMET for efficient quantum simulation of realistic molecules, addressing entanglement challenges.
Findings
Achieved chemical accuracy in ground-state energies for ligand-like molecules.
Validated the approach on IBM's superconducting quantum hardware.
Showed the importance of entanglement-aware embedding for scalable quantum chemistry.
Abstract
The accurate treatment of electron correlation in extended molecular systems remains computationally challenging using classical electronic structure methods. Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms offer a potential route to overcome these limitations; however, their practical deployment on existing quantum computers requires strategies that both reduce problem size and mitigate hardware noise. In this work, we investigate ground-state energy calculations of ligand-like molecules using Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) within the Density Matrix Embedding Theory (DMET) framework, focusing on low-symmetry systems with diverse bonding motifs that exhibit subsystem-dependent variations in fragment-environment entanglement. These entanglement-based variations directly influence bath orbital construction, impurity sizes, and the structure of the embedded Hamiltonians, posing nontrivial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
