Survey-Based Estimation of Probe Group Sizes in the Network Scale-up Method: A Case Study from Jordan
Ian Laga

TL;DR
This paper validates a survey-based method for estimating hidden population sizes in Jordan, demonstrating its reliability and regional variation insights, and offers a practical approach when external data are unavailable.
Contribution
It introduces and validates the direct probe group method combined with Bayesian models for small-area population estimation in the Network Scale-up Method.
Findings
Reliable estimates of migrant domestic workers in Jordan.
Regional variation in social network connectivity.
The method outperforms reliance on official counts.
Abstract
Estimating the size of marginalized populations is a persistent challenge in survey statistics and public health, especially where stigma and legal restrictions exclude such groups from census and administrative data. Migrant domestic workers in Jordan represent one such population. We employ the Network Scale-up Method using the direct probe group method, estimating probe group sizes from survey respondents' own membership rather than relying on external counts. Using data from a nationally representative household survey in Jordan, we combine the direct probe group method with Bayesian logistic mixed-effects models to stabilize small-area estimates at the Governorate level. We validate the method against census data, demonstrating that direct probe group estimates yield reliable inference and provide a practical alternative where known probe group sizes are unavailable. Our results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Homelessness and Social Issues
