Quantifying and Mitigating Selection Bias in LLMs: A Transferable LoRA Fine-Tuning and Efficient Majority Voting Approach
Blessed Guda, Lawrence Francis, Gabrial Zencha Ashungafac, Carlee Joe-Wong, Moise Busogi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel unsupervised metric, an efficient voting method, and a low-rank fine-tuning strategy to measure and reduce selection bias in LLMs during MCQ evaluation, improving reliability and efficiency.
Contribution
It presents a new label-free bias metric, an efficient majority voting method, and an unsupervised fine-tuning approach to mitigate selection bias in LLMs.
Findings
Bias reduction across multiple benchmarks
Enhanced prediction consistency
Lower computational costs
Abstract
Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) answering is a widely used method for evaluating the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, LLMs often exhibit selection bias in MCQ tasks, where their choices are influenced by factors like answer position or option symbols rather than the content. This bias undermines the reliability of MCQ as an evaluation framework. Most existing selection bias metrics require answer labels and measure divergences between prediction and answer distributions, but do not fully capture the consistency of a model's predictions across different orderings of answer choices. Existing selection bias mitigation strategies have notable limitations: majority voting, though effective, is computationally prohibitive; calibration-based methods require validation sets and often fail to generalize across datasets. To address these gaps, we propose three key…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Natural Language Processing Techniques
