The 2/3 Rule of Glass Physics Implies Universalities in Crystal Melting
Peter Lunkenheimer, Konrad Samwer, and Alois Loidl

TL;DR
This paper links the universality in crystal melting to the glass-transition ratio of 2/3, showing that differences in liquid fragility explain variations in viscosity and relaxation times at melting, challenging traditional Lindemann criterion explanations.
Contribution
It introduces a new perspective that melting universality arises from the glass-transition ratio, emphasizing the role of liquid fragility and cooperativity in melting behavior.
Findings
Universal viscosity and relaxation time at melting without cooperativity
The 2/3 ratio explains variations in melting liquids' properties
Corroborated by measurements across different materials
Abstract
Since more than 100 years, melting is thought to be governed by the Lindemann criterion. It assumes that a crystal melts when, upon heating, the growing atomic vibration amplitudes become sufficiently large to destabilize its crystalline lattice. However, it is unclear why the viscosities eta or the related relaxation times tau of the resulting liquids, measured directly at the melting point Tm, differ by up to nine decades, depending on the material. Based on the empirical rule that the ratio of the glass-transition temperature and Tm is about 2/3, here we show that this strong variation is due to differences in the liquid's fragilities, a property associated with pronounced non-Arrhenius behavior and often ascribed to cooperative motions. We propose that, without cooperativity, all crystals would melt into liquids with a universal viscosity value and relaxation time. Hence, the real…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
