Identifying Codes Kernelization Limitations
Aritra Banik, Praneet Kumar Patra, Adele Anna Rescigno, Abhishek Sahu

TL;DR
This paper proves that the Identifying Code problem does not have a polynomial kernel when parameterized by solution size plus vertex cover, unless a major complexity class collapse occurs.
Contribution
It extends kernelization lower bounds to the Identifying Code problem, which was previously unresolved.
Findings
IC does not admit a polynomial kernel under the given parameterization.
The result relies on complexity-theoretic assumptions (NP not in coNP/poly).
Addresses an open question from prior research.
Abstract
The Identifying Code (IC) problem seeks a vertex subset whose intersection with every vertex's closed neighborhood is unique, enabling fault detection in multiprocessor systems and practical uses in identity verification, environmental monitoring, and dynamic localization. A closely related problem is the Locating-Dominating Set (LD), which requires each non-dominating vertex to be uniquely identified by its intersection with the set. Cappelle, Gomes, and Santos (2021) proved that LD is W-hard for minimum clique cover and lacks polynomial kernels for parameters such as vertex cover, but their methods did not apply to IC. This paper answers their question by showing that IC does not admit a polynomial kernel parameterized by solution size plus vertex cover unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInterconnection Networks and Systems · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
