CaptionQA: Is Your Caption as Useful as the Image Itself?
Shijia Yang, Yunong Liu, Bohan Zhai, Ximeng Sun, Zicheng Liu, Emad Barsoum, Manling Li, Chenfeng Xu

TL;DR
CaptionQA introduces a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate how well image captions support downstream tasks across multiple domains, revealing significant gaps in current model capabilities.
Contribution
It presents a new utility-based benchmark with extensive annotations and questions to assess caption usefulness in real-world applications.
Findings
State-of-the-art models show up to 32% lower utility in caption-based tasks compared to image-based tasks.
CaptionQA covers 4 domains with 33,027 annotated questions, enabling detailed utility evaluation.
Models perform substantially worse on caption utility than on traditional image-QA benchmarks.
Abstract
Image captions serve as efficient surrogates for visual content in multimodal systems such as retrieval, recommendation, and multi-step agentic inference pipelines. Yet current evaluation practices miss a fundamental question: Can captions stand-in for images in real downstream tasks? We propose a utility-based benchmark, CaptionQA, to evaluate model-generated captions, where caption quality is measured by how well it supports downstream tasks. CaptionQA is an extensible domain-dependent benchmark covering 4 domains--Natural, Document, E-commerce, and Embodied AI--each with fine-grained taxonomies (25 top-level and 69 subcategories) that identify useful information for domain-specific tasks. CaptionQA builds 33,027 densely annotated multiple-choice questions (50.3 per image on average) that explicitly require visual information to answer, providing a comprehensive probe of caption…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
