Behavioural Sciences and the Regulation of Privacy on the Internet
Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius

TL;DR
This paper discusses how behavioral science insights can inform internet privacy regulation, especially regarding behavioral targeting, and suggests banning certain practices if they harm societal interests.
Contribution
It highlights the policy implications of behavioral sciences for privacy regulation and advocates for banning harmful behavioral targeting practices.
Findings
Enforcing data protection law may be insufficient for privacy protection.
Behavioral targeting involves tracking online behavior for targeted ads.
Policy measures like bans could better protect societal interests.
Abstract
This chapter examines the policy implications of behavioural sciences insights for the regulation of privacy on the Internet, by focusing in particular on behavioural targeting. This marketing technique involves tracking people's online behaviour to use the collected information to show people individually targeted advertisements. Enforcing data protection law may not be enough to protect privacy in this area. I argue that, if society is better off when certain behavioural targeting practices do not happen, policymakers should consider banning them.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection · Digital Platforms and Economics · Freedom of Expression and Defamation
