Towards Trustworthy Wi-Fi CSI-based Sensing: Systematic Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness
Shreevanth Krishnaa Gopalakrishnan, Stephen Hailes

TL;DR
This paper systematically evaluates the adversarial robustness of various CSI-based human sensing models, revealing task-dependent vulnerabilities and emphasizing the importance of physical constraints for secure wireless sensing.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive robustness analysis across multiple architectures and datasets, highlighting the limited correlation between model capacity and robustness, and proposing physical signal constraints as an effective defense.
Findings
Simple architectures are more robust than complex ones.
HAR is highly vulnerable, HID shows inherent resistance.
Physical constraints significantly reduce attack success rates.
Abstract
Machine learning drives Channel State Information (CSI)-based human sensing in modern wireless networks, enabling applications like device-free human activity recognition (HAR) and identification (HID). However, the susceptibility of these models to adversarial perturbations raises security concerns that must be quantified prior to edge deployment. We present a systematic robustness evaluation of five diverse CSI architectures across four public datasets, jointly analyzing white-box, black-box transfer, and universal attacks, together with defense strategies, under unconstrained and physics-guided perturbation boundaries. Contrary to prior assumptions, our experiments reveal that model capacity does not guarantee robustness; simple architectures consistently exhibit superior resilience compared to high-capacity sequence and vision models. Furthermore, vulnerability is fundamentally…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
