CafeQ: Calibration-free Quantization via Learned Transformations and Adaptive Rounding

TL;DR

This paper introduces CafeQ, a calibration-free quantization method for large language models that optimizes transformations and adaptive rounding without calibration data, improving accuracy with minimal overhead.

Contribution

CafeQ proposes a novel calibration-free quantization approach using learned transformations and adaptive rounding, eliminating the need for calibration data while maintaining high accuracy.

Findings

Improves 4-bit quantization score from 61.9 to 62.4 on Gemma 2 9B.

Enhances 3-bit quantization score from 52.0 to 60.6.

Achieves comparable performance to calibration-dependent methods like GPTQ.

Abstract

Post-training quantization is an effective method for reducing the serving cost of large language models, where the standard approach is to use a round-to-nearest quantization level scheme. However, this often introduces large errors due to outliers in the weights. Proposed mitigation mechanisms include applying adaptive rounding, random rotation transformations or committing to a post-training target using calibration data. Unfortunately, this reliance on calibration data can be severely limiting in some real-world scenarios as such data may be unavailable or subject to privacy regulations. In this paper, we propose algorithms to optimize transformations and adaptive rounding without access to any calibration data. The optimization is achieved by designing a suitable proxy function for the quantization loss without calibration data. To maintain inference efficiency, we perform structured matrix transformations for single matrices. For paired weights that interact directly in the computation graph, we use dual matrix transformations and adaptive rounding methods. We conduct experiments on Gemma 2 models, and observe consistent improvement over the baselines. For Gemma 2 9B quantization, our method improves the average benchmark score from 61.9 to 62.4 for 4-bit quantization and from 52.0 to 60.6 for 3-bit quantization, while adding less than 3% of computation overhead. Furthermore, our method achieves performance comparable to the commonly used GPTQ method, which requires calibration data.