A Win-Expectancy Framework for Contextualizing Runs Batted In: Introducing ARBI and CRBI
Wuhuan Deng

TL;DR
This paper introduces ARBI and CRBI, two context-aware metrics for evaluating batting performance by incorporating Win Expectancy, providing a more accurate measure of a player's offensive contribution in baseball.
Contribution
The paper develops ARBI and CRBI, novel RBI metrics that account for game context and leverage, improving upon traditional RBI's limitations.
Findings
ARBI and CRBI better reflect true offensive value.
These metrics improve player evaluation and forecasting.
They offer a more nuanced understanding of run production impact.
Abstract
Runs Batted IN (RBI) records the number of runs a hitter directly drives in during their plate appearances and reflects a batter's ability to convert opportunities into scoring. Because producing runs determines game outcomes, RBI has long served as a central statistic in evaluating offensive performance. However, traditional RBI treats all batted-in runs equally and ignores th game context in which they occur, such as leverage, score state, and the actual impact of a run on a team's chance of winning. In this paper, we introduce two new context-aware metrics-Adjusted RBI (ARBI) and Contextual RBI (CRBI)-that address the fundamental limitations of RBI by incorporating Win Expectancy (WE). ARBI rescales each RBI according to the change in WE before and after the scoring event, assigning more value to runs that meaningfully shift the likelihood of winning and less to runs scored in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics · Probability and Statistical Research
