The Fourier Ratio and complexity of signals
K. Aldaleh, W. Burstein, G. Garza, G. Hart, A. Iosevich, J. Iosevich, A. Khalil, J. King, N. Kulkarni, T. Le, I. Li, A. Mayeli, B. McDonald, K. Nguyen, and N. Shaffer

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Fourier ratio as a measure of signal complexity, showing that signals with small Fourier ratio can be efficiently approximated by low-degree polynomials and have low algorithmic complexity.
Contribution
It establishes a quantitative link between Fourier ratio, signal structure, and learnability, using advanced probabilistic and approximation theory.
Findings
Large Fourier ratio signals are concentrated on sparse sets.
Small Fourier ratio signals are well-approximated by low-degree polynomials.
Small Fourier ratio implies low algorithmic rate--distortion complexity.
Abstract
We study the Fourier ratio of a signal , \[ \mathrm{FR}(f)\ :=\ \sqrt{N}\,\frac{\|\widehat f\|_{L^1(\mu)}}{\|\widehat f\|_{L^2(\mu)}} \ =\ \frac{\|\widehat f\|_1}{\|\widehat f\|_2}, \] as a simple scalar parameter governing Fourier-side complexity, structure, and learnability. Using the Bourgain--Talagrand theory of random subsets of orthonormal systems, we show that signals concentrated on generic sparse sets necessarily have large Fourier ratio, while small forces to be well-approximated in both and by low-degree trigonometric polynomials. Quantitatively, the class admits degree -approximants, which we use to prove that small Fourier ratio implies small algorithmic rate--distortion, a stable refinement of Kolmogorov complexity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical Approximation and Integration · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
