General vs Domain-Specific CNNs: Understanding Pretraining Effects on Brain MRI Tumor Classification
Helia Abedini, Saba Rahimi, and Reza Vaziri

TL;DR
This study compares the effectiveness of domain-specific versus general-purpose pre-trained CNNs for brain MRI tumor classification, revealing that modern general CNNs outperform domain-specific models in limited data scenarios.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis showing that general-purpose CNNs can outperform domain-specific models in medical imaging tasks with limited data.
Findings
ConvNeXt-Tiny achieved 93% accuracy
General CNNs outperformed domain-specific models
Pre-training on diverse datasets can be more effective
Abstract
The accurate identification of brain tumors from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for timely diagnosis and effective therapeutic intervention. While deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), particularly those pre-trained on extensive datasets, have shown considerable promise in medical image analysis, a key question arises when working with limited data: do models pre-trained on specialized medical image repositories outperform those pre-trained on diverse, general-domain datasets? This research presents a comparative analysis of three distinct pre-trained CNN architectures for brain tumor classification: RadImageNet DenseNet121, which leverages pre-training on medical-domain data, alongside two modern general-purpose networks, EfficientNetV2S and ConvNeXt-Tiny. All models were trained and fine-tuned under uniform experimental conditions using a modestly sized brain MRI…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBrain Tumor Detection and Classification · Advanced Neural Network Applications · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
