OmniLens++: Blind Lens Aberration Correction via Large LensLib Pre-Training and Latent PSF Representation
Qi Jiang, Xiaolong Qian, Yao Gao, Lei Sun, Kailun Yang, Zhonghua Yi, Wenyong Li, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Luc Van Gool, Kaiwei Wang

TL;DR
OmniLens++ introduces a scalable, pre-trained deep learning framework that uses latent PSF representations to effectively correct diverse lens aberrations, demonstrating state-of-the-art generalization in blind optical degradation correction.
Contribution
The paper presents OmniLens++, a novel framework that leverages large-scale lens library pre-training and latent PSF modeling to improve generalization in blind lens aberration correction.
Findings
OmniLens++ achieves state-of-the-art correction performance on real-world and synthetic lenses.
The framework demonstrates strong generalization across diverse optical aberrations.
Latent PSF representations enhance the model's ability to utilize optical degradation priors.
Abstract
Emerging deep-learning-based lens library pre-training (LensLib-PT) pipeline offers a new avenue for blind lens aberration correction by training a universal neural network, demonstrating strong capability in handling diverse unknown optical degradations. This work proposes the OmniLens++ framework, which resolves two challenges that hinder the generalization ability of existing pipelines: the difficulty of scaling data and the absence of prior guidance characterizing optical degradation. To improve data scalability, we expand the design specifications to increase the degradation diversity of the lens source, and we sample a more uniform distribution by quantifying the spatial-variation patterns and severity of optical degradation. In terms of model design, to leverage the Point Spread Functions (PSFs), which intuitively describe optical degradation, as guidance in a blind paradigm, we…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
The paper presents a technically solid and conceptually novel contribution by linking large-scale lens data construction with degradation-prior learning in a blind setting. The experimental evaluation is comprehensive and compelling, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance across both simulation and real-world benchmarks. The writing is clear and well-structured, making the technical contributions straightforward to follow.
Although the framework is comprehensive and experimentally solid, I find the overall technical novelty is relatively limited. The proposed VQVAE-based design represents a straightforward structural adaptation rather than a fundamentally new methodological contribution. While the integration of the Optical Degradation Network (ODN) to regularize the latent space is a thoughtful addition, it largely follows standard practice in generative modeling and degradation-aware representation learning. Th
Combining a broadened, more uniformly sampled synsthetic lens library with a learned latent prior is technically sound and novel. The experimental validation is extensive, spanning diverse simulated aberration settings, and includes ablation studies showing that AODLibpro improves over earlier AODLib-EAOD settings and LPR guidance helps as data scale increases.
The presentation is needlessly hard to parse. The paper is overloaded with abbreviations (OD, CAC, ODN, OIQ, etc.), many of which describe concepts that could be expressed directly or formally. Optical degradation (OD) is essentially a forward operator in an inverse problem. Computational Aberration Correction could simply be described as image reconstruction and an Optical Degradation Network is, at its core, a neural network modeling the forward process. This naming density obscures rather tha
I agree that training an “all-in-one” network for various lens aberrations is an interesting academic exploration, but which requires a more comprehensive benchmark.
1. Regarding the paper's writing, two points need improvement: - The baseline for this paper is the arXiv paper “OmniLens: Towards Universal Lens Aberration Correction via LensLib-to-Specific Domain Adaptation.” However, the OmniLens framework is not clearly described in the main text. Readers may also be confused about whether there is an "OmniLens+" between OmniLens and OmniLens++. - There are too many uncommon abbreviations, for example, OD for optical degradation, LPR for latent PSF repr
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSurface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
