Environmental Invariance of the Galaxy Size-Mass Relation
Li-Wen Liao, Andrew Cooper

TL;DR
This study investigates how galaxy sizes relate to their environment and finds that size variations are mainly due to different galaxy subpopulations rather than direct environmental effects, supporting the importance of individual assembly histories.
Contribution
It provides a large, homogeneous dataset of galaxy sizes across a wide mass range and demonstrates that environment influences size primarily through subpopulation composition rather than direct size changes.
Findings
Size-mass relations agree with previous studies.
Environmental effects are due to subpopulation differences, not direct size transformation.
Size relations for subpopulations are environment-insensitive.
Abstract
The galaxy size-luminosity and size-stellar mass relations are important constraints on the galactic baryon cycle of gas accretion, star formation, and feedback. There are conflicting claims in the literature regarding how environment influences size: both direct transformative effects and `assembly bias' may contribute to observed variations with environment. We construct a large homogeneous sample of size measurements to M*~10^7 Msun. Our sample fills a gap in field galaxy size measurements around 10^7-10^8 Msun; the literature at these masses is biased towards satellites of L* galaxies and members of galaxy clusters. We use sizes from the DESI-LS, together with a published catalog that contains stellar masses and cluster positions derived from DESI-LS photometry. Our sample extends to z<0.3 and comprises 540,228 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts and 9,513,732 galaxies with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
