Coupled atmospHere Interior modeL Intercomparison (CHILI) Protocol Version 1.0: A CUISINES Intercomparison Project of Magma Ocean Models
Tim Lichtenberg, Laura Schaefer, Joshua Krissansen-Totton, Yamila Miguel, Denis E. Sergeev, Philipp Baumeister, Jessica Cmiel, Leoni J. Janssen, T. Giang Nguyen, Yoshinori Miyazaki, Harrison Nicholls, Alexandra Papesh, Hugo Pelissard, Bo Peng, Junellie Perez, Emma Postolec

TL;DR
The CHILI project establishes a protocol for comparing coupled atmosphere-interior models of planets, aiming to understand differences in modeling approaches for Solar System and exoplanetary atmospheres over geological timescales.
Contribution
It introduces a standardized intercomparison protocol for magma ocean models, facilitating systematic evaluation of diverse modeling methodologies in planetary science.
Findings
Initial tests on early Earth and TRAPPIST-1 b models show differences in energy transport and geochemistry treatments.
The protocol enables quantification of model discrepancies in atmosphere-interior evolution predictions.
Results will inform improvements in planetary atmosphere and interior modeling techniques.
Abstract
Spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanets with the James Webb Space Telescope has brought the origin and evolution of their atmospheres into the focus of exoplanet science. Time-evolved models of the feedback between interior and atmosphere are critical to predict and interpret these observations and link them to the Solar System terrestrial planets. However, models differ in methodologies and input data, which can lead to significant differences in interpretation. In this paper, we present the experimental protocol of the Coupled atmospHere Interior modeL Intercomparison (CHILI) project. CHILI is an (exo-)planet model intercomparison project within the Climates Using Interactive Suites of Intercomparisons Nested for Exoplanet Studies (CUISINES) framework, which aims to support a diverse set of multi-model intercomparison projects in the exoplanet community. The present…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
