Nonadaptive One-Way to Hiding Implies Adaptive Quantum Reprogramming
Joseph Jaeger

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that adaptive quantum reprogramming security results can be derived from nonadaptive one-way to hiding theorems, challenging previous beliefs about their independence.
Contribution
It shows that adaptive reprogramming results in quantum cryptography follow from nonadaptive theorems, simplifying the understanding of quantum security proofs.
Findings
Adaptive reprogramming results derive from nonadaptive theorems
Contradicts prior beliefs about independence of adaptive frameworks
Simplifies quantum security proof techniques
Abstract
An important proof technique in the random oracle model involves reprogramming it on hard to predict inputs and arguing that an attacker cannot detect that this occurred. In the quantum setting, a particularly challenging version of this considers adaptive reprogramming wherein the points to be reprogrammed (or the output values they should be programmed to) are dependent on choices made by the adversary. Some quantum frameworks for analyzing adaptive reprogramming were given by Unruh (CRYPTO 2014, EUROCRYPT 2015), Grilo-H\"ovelmanns-H\"ulsing-Majenz (ASIACRYPT 2021), and Pan-Zeng (PKC 2024). We show, counterintuitively, that these adaptive results follow from the \emph{nonadaptive} one-way to hiding theorem of Ambainis-Hamburg-Unruh (CRYPTO 2019). These implications contradict beliefs (whether stated explicitly or implicitly) that some properties of the adaptive frameworks cannot be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography
