Implicit and explicit treatments of model error in numerical simulation
Danny Smyl

TL;DR
This paper reviews methods for modeling and correcting errors in numerical simulations of physical systems, focusing on implicit and explicit approaches to improve accuracy and uncertainty quantification.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive survey of techniques for approximating and accounting for model errors across various computational and data assimilation contexts.
Findings
Bayesian approximation error framework enhances uncertainty quantification.
Machine learning methods improve discrepancy correction.
Multi-fidelity strategies optimize computational resources.
Abstract
Numerical simulations of physical systems exhibit discrepancies arising from unmodeled physics and idealizations, as well as numerical approximation errors stemming from discretization and solver tolerances. This article reviews techniques developed in the past several decades to approximate and account for model errors, both implicitly and explicitly. Beginning from fundamentals, we frame model error in inverse problems, data assimilation, and predictive modeling contexts. We then survey major approaches: the Bayesian approximation error framework, embedded internal error models for structural uncertainty, probabilistic numerical methods for discretization uncertainty, model discrepancy modeling in Bayesian calibration and its recent extensions, machine-learning-based discrepancy correction, multi-fidelity and hybrid modeling strategies, as well as residual-based, variational, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
