Detectability of axion-like dark matter for different time-delay interferometry combinations in space-based gravitational wave detectors
Yong-Yong Liu, Jing-Rui Zhang, Ming-Hui Du, He-Shan Liu, Peng Xu, Yun-Long Zhang

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the sensitivity of space-based gravitational wave detectors to axion-like dark matter via polarization effects, comparing different interferometry combinations and proposing modifications for improved detection.
Contribution
It introduces the use of wave plates in space-based detectors to detect axion-induced birefringence and compares sensitivities across various interferometry configurations.
Findings
Monitor and Beacon combinations have better high-frequency sensitivity.
Optimal sensitivity reaches $g_{aeta} ext{~}10^{-13}$ GeV$^{-1}$.
ASTROD-GW can detect axion-like dark matter down to $10^{-20}$ eV.
Abstract
In the space-based gravitational wave detections, the axion-like dark matter would alter the polarization state of the laser link between spacecrafts due to the birefringence effect. However, current designs of space-based laser interferometer are insensitive to variations in the polarization angle. Thus, the additional wave plates are employed to enable the response of the axion-induced birefringence effect. We calculate and compare the sensitivities of different space-based detectors, accounting for three time-delay interferometry combinations, including Monitor, Beacon, and Relay. We find that the Monitor and Beacon combinations have better sensitivity in the high-frequency range, and the optimal sensitivity reaches , while the Sagnac combination is superior in the low-frequency range. We also find that ASTROD-GW can cover the detection range…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
