Towards Understanding Layer Contributions in Tabular In-Context Learning Models
Amir Rezaei Balef, Mykhailo Koshil, Katharina Eggensperger

TL;DR
This paper explores how individual layers in tabular in-context learning models contribute to predictions, revealing redundancies and similarities with large language models, which can inform model compression and interpretability.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of layer-wise contributions in tabular ICL models, highlighting redundancies and comparing dynamics with LLMs.
Findings
Only subsets of layers share common representations
Identification of redundant layers suggests potential for model compression
Layer dynamics in tabular ICL models are similar to those in LLMs
Abstract
Despite the architectural similarities between tabular in-context learning (ICL) models and large language models (LLMs), little is known about how individual layers contribute to tabular prediction. In this paper, we investigate how the latent spaces evolve across layers in tabular ICL models, identify potential redundant layers, and compare these dynamics with those observed in LLMs. We analyze TabPFN and TabICL through the "layers as painters" perspective, finding that only subsets of layers share a common representational language, suggesting structural redundancy and offering opportunities for model compression and improved interpretability.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Topic Modeling · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
