Utilizing subgroup information in random-effects meta-analysis of few studies
Ao Huang, Christian R\"over, Tim Friede

TL;DR
This paper introduces a subgroup-based inference method for random-effects meta-analysis, improving small-sample performance when few studies are available, by synthesizing data at the subgroup level and using tailored heterogeneity estimators.
Contribution
It proposes a novel subgroup-level synthesis approach with new heterogeneity estimators, enhancing accuracy and interval precision in small-sample meta-analyses.
Findings
Improved heterogeneity estimation in small-sample settings.
More accurate confidence intervals with t-quantile based methods.
Effective application demonstrated through real data examples.
Abstract
Random-effects meta-analyses are widely used for evidence synthesis in medical research. However, conventional methods based on large-sample approximations often exhibit poor performance in case of very few studies (e.g., 2 to 4), which is very common in practice. Existing methods aiming to improve small-sample performance either still suffer from poor estimates of heterogeneity or result in very wide confidence intervals. Motivated by meta-analyses evaluating surrogate outcomes, where units nested within a trial are often exploited when the number of trials is small, we propose an inference approach based on a common-effect estimator synthesizing data from the subgroup-level instead of the study-level. Two DerSimonian-Laird type heterogeneity estimators are derived using the subgroup-level data, and are incorporated into the Henmi-Copas type variance to adequately reflect variance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
