On the Internal Semantics of Time-Series Foundation Models
Atharva Pandey, Abhilash Neog, Gautam Jajoo

TL;DR
This paper systematically investigates how Time-series Foundation Models internally represent concepts, revealing that different layers encode various temporal features and that compositional understanding remains challenging.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of concept encoding, linear recoverability, and representation evolution in TSFMs, highlighting current limitations in compositional understanding.
Findings
Early layers encode local time-domain patterns
Deeper layers capture dispersion and change signals
Representation of concept composition degrades with complexity
Abstract
Time-series Foundation Models (TSFMs) have recently emerged as a universal paradigm for learning across diverse temporal domains. However, despite their empirical success, the internal mechanisms by which these models represent fundamental time-series concepts remain poorly understood. In this work, we undertake a systematic investigation of concept interpretability in TSFMs. Specifically, we examine: (i) which layers encode which concepts, (ii) whether concept parameters are linearly recoverable, (iii) how representations evolve in terms of concept disentanglement and abstraction across model depth, and (iv) how models process compositions of concepts. We systematically probe these questions using layer-wise analyses, linear recoverability tests, and representation similarity measures, providing a structured account of TSFM semantics. The resulting insights show that early layers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTime Series Analysis and Forecasting · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
