Efficiency Will Not Lead to Sustainable Reasoning AI
Philipp Wiesner, Daniel W. O'Neill, Francesca Larosa, Odej Kao

TL;DR
This paper argues that efficiency improvements alone cannot ensure the sustainability of reasoning AI, as performance continues to scale with exponential compute investments beyond physical limits.
Contribution
It highlights the need for explicit limits and governance in AI development to address sustainability challenges in reasoning AI.
Findings
Efficiency gains are nearing physical limits.
Performance scales with exponential compute investments.
Sustainable reasoning AI requires new policy approaches.
Abstract
AI research is increasingly moving toward complex problem solving, where models are optimized not only for pattern recognition but for multi-step reasoning. Historically, computing's global energy footprint has been stabilized by sustained efficiency gains and natural saturation thresholds in demand. But as efficiency improvements are approaching physical limits, emerging reasoning AI lacks comparable saturation points: performance is no longer limited by the amount of available training data but continues to scale with exponential compute investments in both training and inference. This paper argues that efficiency alone will not lead to sustainable reasoning AI and discusses research and policy directions to embed explicit limits into the optimization and governance of such systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBig Data and Digital Economy · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
