Going Places: Place Recognition in Artificial and Natural Systems
Michael Milford, Tobias Fischer

TL;DR
This review compares biological and artificial place recognition systems, highlighting shared strategies and proposing a unified framework to advance autonomous localization by integrating insights from animals, humans, and machines.
Contribution
It synthesizes cross-disciplinary findings to develop a unified conceptual framework for place recognition, bridging biological and artificial systems.
Findings
Animals use multimodal cues for navigation
Humans incorporate semantic and cultural factors
Artificial systems employ scalable, data-driven models
Abstract
Place recognition, the ability to identify previously visited locations, is critical for both biological navigation and autonomous systems. This review synthesizes findings from robotic systems, animal studies, and human research to explore how different systems encode and recall place. We examine the computational and representational strategies employed across artificial systems, animals, and humans, highlighting convergent solutions such as topological mapping, cue integration, and memory management. Animal systems reveal evolved mechanisms for multimodal navigation and environmental adaptation, while human studies provide unique insights into semantic place concepts, cultural influences, and introspective capabilities. Artificial systems showcase scalable architectures and data-driven models. We propose a unifying set of concepts by which to consider and develop place recognition…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial Cognition and Navigation · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Social Robot Interaction and HRI
