Intervention Efficiency and Perturbation Validation Framework: Capacity-Aware and Robust Clinical Model Selection under the Rashomon Effect
Yuwen Zhang, Viet Tran, Paul Weng

TL;DR
This paper introduces two tools, Intervention Efficiency and Perturbation Validation Framework, to improve robust model selection in clinical machine learning by considering capacity constraints and stability under data perturbations.
Contribution
It proposes capacity-aware metrics and structured validation methods to address model multiplicity and improve trustworthy deployment in clinical settings.
Findings
Models selected with IE and PVF generalize better.
Tools identify models robust to data shifts.
Framework aligns model choice with clinical capacity constraints.
Abstract
In clinical machine learning, the coexistence of multiple models with comparable performance (a manifestation of the Rashomon Effect) poses fundamental challenges for trustworthy deployment and evaluation. Small, imbalanced, and noisy datasets, coupled with high-dimensional and weakly identified clinical features, amplify this multiplicity and make conventional validation schemes unreliable. As a result, selecting among equally performing models becomes uncertain, particularly when resource constraints and operational priorities are not considered by conventional metrics like F1 score. To address these issues, we propose two complementary tools for robust model assessment and selection: Intervention Efficiency (IE) and the Perturbation Validation Framework (PVF). IE is a capacity-aware metric that quantifies how efficiently a model identifies actionable true positives when only limited…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
