Making Evidence Actionable in Adaptive Learning
Amirreza Mehrabi, Jason W. Morphew, Breejha Quezada, N. Sanjay Rebello

TL;DR
This paper introduces a teacher-guided feedback system for adaptive learning that optimizes micro-interventions using formalized algorithms, ensuring effective, equitable, and scalable personalized education.
Contribution
It presents a novel, formalized approach to converting assessment evidence into targeted interventions with safeguards, and demonstrates its effectiveness in real classroom deployment.
Findings
Full skill coverage achieved for nearly all students within time bounds.
Gradient-based method reduced redundant interventions by ~12%.
Greedy method offered lower computational cost in resource-scarce settings.
Abstract
Adaptive learning often diagnoses precisely yet intervenes weakly, yielding help that is mistimed or misaligned. This study presents evidence supporting an instructor-governed feedback loop that converts concept-level assessment evidence into vetted micro-interventions. The adaptive learning algorithm contains three safeguards: adequacy as a hard guarantee of gap closure, attention as a budgeted constraint for time and redundancy, and diversity as protection against overfitting to a single resource. We formalize intervention assignment as a binary integer program with constraints for coverage, time, difficulty windows informed by ability estimates, prerequisites encoded by a concept matrix, and anti-redundancy enforced through diversity. Greedy selection serves low-richness and tight-latency regimes, gradient-based relaxation serves rich repositories, and a hybrid method transitions…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Educational Assessment and Pedagogy · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
