A Disentangled Low-Rank RNN Framework for Uncovering Neural Connectivity and Dynamics
Chengrui Li, Yunmiao Wang, Yule Wang, Weihan Li, Dieter Jaeger, Anqi Wu

TL;DR
This paper introduces DisRNN, a novel low-rank RNN framework that enhances the interpretability and disentanglement of neural latent dynamics by enforcing group-wise independence, improving understanding of neural connectivity.
Contribution
DisRNN extends low-rank RNNs by incorporating a disentanglement mechanism through a variational autoencoder framework and partial correlation penalties, enabling clearer interpretation of neural dynamics.
Findings
DisRNN outperforms baseline lrRNNs in disentanglement and interpretability.
DisRNN effectively captures complex neural dynamics in synthetic and real data.
Enhanced interpretability aids understanding of neural connectivity and computation.
Abstract
Low-rank recurrent neural networks (lrRNNs) are a class of models that uncover low-dimensional latent dynamics underlying neural population activity. Although their functional connectivity is low-rank, it lacks disentanglement interpretations, making it difficult to assign distinct computational roles to different latent dimensions. To address this, we propose the Disentangled Recurrent Neural Network (DisRNN), a generative lrRNN framework that assumes group-wise independence among latent dynamics while allowing flexible within-group entanglement. These independent latent groups allow latent dynamics to evolve separately, but are internally rich for complex computation. We reformulate the lrRNN under a variational autoencoder (VAE) framework, enabling us to introduce a partial correlation penalty that encourages disentanglement between groups of latent dimensions. Experiments on…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
The paper addresses a timely question in computational neuroscience The authors put forward what appears to be a novel approach to fit neural population dynamics. The proposed methods appear to the technically sound.
I found the paper quite challenging to parse. The description of the methods and findings in the main text is dense, making an evaluation of the findings challenging. Overall, the authors could have done much more to demonstrate in what settings and how well their method works in retrieving dynamics and ground-truth parameters, and in what settings and how it fails. The main simulations used to demonstrate the validity of the approach are based on a ground truth that by design factorizes into
The paper is definitely timely, and the method seems interesting and (up to the issues of uncited work mentioned below) novel. The example applications are mostly convincing.
The manuscript misses references to closely-related previous work. Most importantly, this is not the first paper to propose a VAE-inspired framework for learning disentangled representations in RNNs. Indeed, there is a previous work by [Miller and colleagues (NeurIPS 2023)](https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/file/c194ced51c857ec2c1928b02250e0ac8-Paper-Conference.pdf) that in fact adopts the same "DisRNN" acronym! So far as I can see, that prior art goes uncited in this work. S
S1. The disentanglement term in the loss potentially leads to more interpretable latents compared to previous approaches. S2. The method shows improvement over baselines on a specific disentanglement $r^2$ metric. S3. The figures are generally informative and clear.
W1. The authors write as their first contribution (line 064) that they obtain a generative RNN model. However as far as I understand the authors never show any generation / simulations of the fitted RNN (unlike previous LINT and SMC methods, which did show adequate simulations). In my opinion the author should either adjust their text to reflect they are interested in inference / $p(z|x)$ only, or to also show RNN simulations. W2. I think the paper requires some clarification of the methods: -
- The formulation of low-rank RNNs in terms of a VAE bridges different perspectives and may not be well known. - The authors not only test their method with in synthetic settings with known ground truth, but also apply it to real neural data.
- The motivation for the need for such a method was rather weak, and the presentation of the method felt confusing and disorganized at times. For instance, the history convolution kernel used in the formulation of DisRNN seems like an unnecessary complication that is unrelated to the stated goal of the method, and unless I'm mistaken it was also not clarified as to what was actually used for it in experiments (I'm assuming the trivial kernel with the full support at $\tau=0$ was chosen?). - The
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
