Randomized Controlled Trials for Conditional Access Optimization Agent
James Bono, Beibei Cheng, Joaquin Lozano

TL;DR
This paper presents the first randomized controlled trial demonstrating that an AI agent significantly improves accuracy and efficiency in managing Conditional Access policies in enterprise identity governance.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that AI agents can effectively enhance performance in complex identity management tasks, a novel contribution in this domain.
Findings
Accuracy improved by 48% with AI assistance
Task completion time decreased by 43%
Largest benefits observed in cognitively demanding tasks
Abstract
AI agents are increasingly deployed to automate complex enterprise workflows, yet evidence of their effectiveness in identity governance is limited. We report results from the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an AI agent for Conditional Access (CA) policy management in Microsoft Entra. The agent assists with four high-value tasks: policy merging, Zero-Trust baseline gap detection, phased rollout planning, and user-policy alignment. In a production-grade environment, 162 identity administrators were randomly assigned to a control group (no agent) or treatment group (agent-assisted) and asked to perform these tasks. Agent access produced substantial gains: accuracy improved by 48% and task completion time decreased by 43% while holding accuracy constant. The largest benefits emerged on cognitively demanding tasks such as baseline gap detection. These findings demonstrate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAccess Control and Trust · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
