Can LLMs Create Legally Relevant Summaries and Analyses of Videos?
Lyra Hoeben-Kuil, Gijs van Dijck, Jaromir Savelka, Johanna Gunawan, Konrad Kollnig, Marta Kolacz, Mindy Duffourc, Shashank Chakravarthy, Hannes Westermann

TL;DR
This paper explores the ability of large language models to understand and generate legally relevant summaries and analyses of videos, demonstrating promising results that could enhance access to justice.
Contribution
It investigates LLMs' capacity to interpret and summarize videos for legal purposes, a novel application beyond traditional text-based tasks.
Findings
71.7% of summaries rated as high or medium quality
Demonstrates potential for LLMs in legal video analysis
Opens avenues for improving access to justice
Abstract
Understanding the legally relevant factual basis of an event and conveying it through text is a key skill of legal professionals. This skill is important for preparing forms (e.g., insurance claims) or other legal documents (e.g., court claims), but often presents a challenge for laypeople. Current AI approaches aim to bridge this gap, but mostly rely on the user to articulate what has happened in text, which may be challenging for many. Here, we investigate the capability of large language models (LLMs) to understand and summarize events occurring in videos. We ask an LLM to summarize and draft legal letters, based on 120 YouTube videos showing legal issues in various domains. Overall, 71.7\% of the summaries were rated as of high or medium quality, which is a promising result, opening the door to a number of applications in e.g. access to justice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Topic Modeling · Authorship Attribution and Profiling
