Architectural Approaches to Fault-Tolerant Distributed Quantum Computing and Their Entanglement Overheads
Nitish Kumar Chandra, Eneet Kaur, Kaushik P. Seshadreesan

TL;DR
This paper compares three architectural approaches for fault-tolerant distributed quantum computing, analyzing their resource overheads and scalability using surface and toric codes.
Contribution
It categorizes and evaluates three distinct architectural types for fault-tolerant DQC, providing insights into their resource scaling and suitability for near-term hardware.
Findings
Type 1 architectures require GHZ states for nonlocal stabilizer measurements.
Type 2 architectures distribute error correction across modules with local stabilizer measurements.
Type 3 architectures enable fault-tolerant operations like transversal gates and lattice surgery.
Abstract
Fault tolerant quantum computation over distributed quantum computing (DQC) platforms requires careful evaluation of resource requirements and noise thresholds. As quantum hardware advances toward modular and networked architectures, various fault tolerant DQC schemes have been proposed, which can be broadly categorized into three architectural types. Type 1 architectures consist of small quantum nodes connected via Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states, enabling nonlocal stabilizer measurements. Type 2 architectures distribute a large error correcting code block across multiple modules, with most stabilizer measurements remaining local, except for a small subset at patch boundaries that are performed using nonlocal CNOT gates. Type 3 architectures assign code blocks to distinct modules and can perform fault tolerant operations such as transversal gates, lattice surgery, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
