Alpha Divergence Losses for Biometric Verification
Dimitrios Koutsianos, Ladislav Mosner, Yannis Panagakis, Themos Stafylakis

TL;DR
This paper introduces two novel margin-based alpha-divergence loss functions for biometric verification, improving performance and sparsity, and demonstrating significant gains on face and speaker verification benchmarks.
Contribution
The paper proposes two new alpha-divergence loss variants, Q-Margin and A3M, integrating angular margins and addressing training instability, advancing biometric verification methods.
Findings
Significant performance improvements on IJB-B and IJB-C benchmarks.
Strong results in speaker verification on VoxCeleb.
Outperforms baselines at low false acceptance rates.
Abstract
Performance in face and speaker verification is largely driven by margin-based softmax losses such as CosFace and ArcFace. Recently introduced -divergence loss functions offer a compelling alternative, particularly due to their ability to induce sparse solutions (when ). However, integrating an angular margin-crucial for verification tasks-is not straightforward. We find that this integration can be achieved in at least two distinct ways: via the reference measure (prior probabilities) or via the logits (unnormalized log-likelihoods). In this paper, we explore both pathways, deriving two novel margin-based -divergence losses: Q-Margin (margin in the reference measure) and A3M (margin in the logits). We identify and address a training instability in A3M-caused by sparsity-with a simple yet effective prototype re-initialization strategy. Our methods achieve…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace recognition and analysis · Speech Recognition and Synthesis · Biometric Identification and Security
