Uniform Circular Arrays in Near-Field: Omnidirectional Coverage with Limited Capacity

TL;DR

This paper compares uniform circular arrays and linear arrays in near-field scenarios, introducing the EBRD metric to evaluate their spatial multiplexing capabilities and analyzing their performance under different constraints.

Contribution

It introduces the effective beamfocusing Rayleigh distance (EBRD) as a new metric and provides closed-form expressions for beamdepth and EBRD for UCAs, comparing their performance to ULAs.

Findings

ULAs have narrower beamdepth and longer EBRD at fixed element count.

UCAs offer slightly narrower beamdepth and marginally longer EBRD at fixed aperture.

ULAs achieve higher sum rate under fixed element constraint, while UCAs perform marginally better under fixed aperture.

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that uniform circular arrays (UCAs) can extend the angular coverage of the radiative near field region. This work investigates whether such enhanced angular coverage translates into improved spatial multiplexing performance when compared to uniform linear arrays (ULAs). To more accurately delineate the effective near field region, we introduce the effective beamfocusing Rayleigh distance (EBRD), an angle dependent metric that bounds the spatial region where beamfocusing remains effective. Closed form expressions for both beamdepth and EBRD are derived for UCAs. Our analysis shows that, under a fixed antenna element count, ULAs achieve narrower beamdepth and a longer EBRD than UCAs. Conversely, under a fixed aperture length, UCAs provide slightly narrower beamdepth and a marginally longer EBRD. Simulation results further confirm that ULAs achieve higher sum rate under the fixed element constraint, while UCAs offer marginal performance gain under the fixed aperture constraint.