The Impact of Orbital Anisotropy Assumptions in Lensing-Dynamics Modeling

TL;DR

This study assesses how assumptions about stellar orbital anisotropy affect joint lensing-dynamics models of galaxies, finding that common assumptions do not introduce significant biases in mass and dark matter estimates.

Contribution

It demonstrates that typical orbital anisotropy assumptions have minimal impact on galaxy mass and dark matter inferences in lensing-dynamics modeling.

Findings

Systematic biases in stellar mass are less than 0.03 dex.

Dark matter fraction bias is less than 2%.

Inner density slope is over-predicted by 0.15.

Abstract

We investigate potential systematic biases introduced by assumptions regarding stellar orbital anisotropy in joint lensing-dynamics modeling. Our study employs the massive early-type galaxies from the TNG100 simulation at redshifts z = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.7. Based on the simulated galaxies, we generate a self-consistent mock dataset containing both lensing and stellar kinematic observables. This is achieved through taking the potential composed of both dark matter and baryons of the simulated galaxies, plus the radial variation of the stellar orbit anisotropy depicted by a logistic function. By integrating constraints from both lensing and stellar kinematics, we separate the contributions of stars and dark matter inside the galaxies. Under three commonly adopted stellar anisotropy assumptions (isotropic orbits, constant anisotropy, and the Osipkov-Merritt profile), the model inferences suggest that the systematic biases in the total stellar mass and central dark matter fraction are not significant. Specifically, the total stellar mass on average is underestimated by less than $0.03\pm0.10$ $\rm dex$ while the dark matter fraction experiences only a statistically insignificant increase of less than $2\%\pm10\%$ at the population level. The dark matter inner density slope in our tests is over-predicted by $0.15\pm0.2$. Additionally, these lacks of significant biases are insensitive to the discrepancies between the assumed anisotropy in modeling and the ground truth orbital anisotropy of mock sample. Our results suggest that conventional assumptions regarding orbital anisotropy, such as an isotropic profile or the Osipkov-Merritt model, would not introduce a significant systematic bias when inferring galaxy mass density distribution at the population level.