Heterogeneous CACC Coexistence: Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling

TL;DR

This paper investigates the safety and performance of heterogeneous vehicle platoons with mixed Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control algorithms through simulation, revealing which combinations are robust and highlighting the need for better modeling frameworks.

Contribution

It introduces the concept of mixed platoons with heterogeneous CACCs and provides a simulation-based analysis of their safety and efficiency, addressing a gap in existing research.

Findings

Some CACC combinations operate safely and robustly.

Certain mixtures show critical safety and comfort limitations.

Heterogeneous platoons impact traffic throughput and safety.

Abstract

The design of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) algorithms for vehicle platooning has been extensively investigated, leading to a wide range of approaches with different requirements and performance. Most existing studies evaluate these algorithms under the assumption of homogeneous platoons, i.e., when all platoon members adopt the same CACC. However, market competition is likely to result in vehicles from different manufacturers implementing distinct CACCs. This raises fundamental questions about whether heterogeneous vehicles can safely cooperate within a platoon and what performance can be achieved. To date, these questions have received little attention, as heterogeneous platoons are difficult to model and analyze. In this work, we introduce the concept of mixed platoons, i.e., platoons made of vehicles running heterogeneous CACCs, and we study their performance through simulation-based experiments. We consider mixtures of three well-established CACCs from the literature. In the first part of the paper, we study a single mixed platoon in isolation to understand the microscopic effects on safety: we evaluate the performance of various CACC-mixtures across speed change and emergency braking scenarios. In the second part, we examine a high-density ring-road scenario to assess macroscopic impacts on safety, comfort, and traffic throughput, especially comparing throughput results with those obtained from vehicles controlled by a standard Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) or by human drivers. Our findings highlight that some combinations of CACCs can operate robustly and safely, while others exhibit critical limitations in safety, comfort, or efficiency. These results emphasize the need for careful system design and the development of theoretical frameworks for modeling heterogeneous platoons.