Multi-agent Undercover Gaming: Hallucination Removal via Counterfactual Test for Multimodal Reasoning
Dayong Liang, Xiao-Yong Wei, Changmeng Zheng

TL;DR
This paper introduces Multi-agent Undercover Gaming (MUG), a novel framework that detects hallucinations in multimodal reasoning by employing counterfactual tests and active, cross-evidence reasoning among agents.
Contribution
MUG advances multi-agent debate by integrating counterfactual testing and active reasoning to improve hallucination detection and multimodal reasoning reliability.
Findings
Enhanced hallucination detection accuracy
Improved multimodal reasoning robustness
Effective identification of hallucinating agents
Abstract
Hallucination continues to pose a major obstacle in the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Although the Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) paradigm offers a promising solution by promoting consensus among multiple agents to enhance reliability, it relies on the unrealistic assumption that all debaters are rational and reflective, which is a condition that may not hold when agents themselves are prone to hallucinations. To address this gap, we introduce the Multi-agent Undercover Gaming (MUG) protocol, inspired by social deduction games like "Who is Undercover?". MUG reframes MAD as a process of detecting "undercover" agents (those suffering from hallucinations) by employing multimodal counterfactual tests. Specifically, we modify reference images to introduce counterfactual evidence and observe whether agents can accurately identify these changes, providing ground-truth for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Topic Modeling
