The signature of major mergers on the hydrostatic mass bias of galaxy clusters
Isac Barranco-Llorca, David Vall\'es-P\'erez, Susana Planelles, Vicent Quilis

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution cosmological simulations to analyze how major galaxy cluster mergers influence the hydrostatic mass bias, revealing characteristic temporal patterns and their dependence on dynamical state and merger history.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the physical mechanisms driving hydrostatic mass bias during mergers, including a simple functional form to model its evolution over time.
Findings
Hydrostatic mass bias exhibits a characteristic trend during mergers: a negative dip, a positive peak, then a return to pre-merger levels.
Morphological and dynamical reconfigurations of the gas density primarily drive the bias evolution.
The bias pattern is consistent across different radii within the virial radius, with variations in amplitude and timescale.
Abstract
While galaxy cluster masses are fundamental cosmological observables, estimates based on intra-cluster medium observations rely on hydrostatic equilibrium, introducing a systematic bias. We investigate how mergers drive the time evolution of this hydrostatic mass bias, identifying the dominant physical mechanisms and their dependence on dynamical state and merger history. Using a high-resolution AMR Eulerian+-body cosmological simulation, we analyse a sample of cluster mergers within , comparing true and hydrostatic masses derived from gas density and temperature profiles, and tracing their evolution. At , the hydrostatic mass bias shows a mild correlation with dynamical state. During major mergers, the bias follows a characteristic trend: a sharp negative dip around the merger time, a transient positive peak, and a gradual return to pre-merger levels. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
