Classifying Histopathologic Glioblastoma Sub-regions with EfficientNet

TL;DR

This study develops a deep learning method using EfficientNet architectures to classify six histopathological sub-regions of glioblastoma in digitized tissue images, aiming to improve understanding and diagnosis of this aggressive brain tumor.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel four-step deep learning approach utilizing EfficientNet variants for accurate glioblastoma sub-region classification on a large annotated dataset.

Findings

EfficientNet-B1 and B4 achieved F1 scores of 0.98 on training data.

Model performance decreased on validation and test data, indicating generalization challenges.

The approach demonstrates potential for automated histopathological analysis of glioblastoma.

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common aggressive, fast-growing brain tumor, with a grim prognosis. Despite clinical diagnostic advancements, there have not been any substantial improvements to patient prognosis. Histopathological assessment of excised tumors is the first line of clinical diagnostic routine. We hypothesize that automated, robust, and accurate identification of distinct histological sub-regions within GBM could contribute to morphologically understanding this disease at scale. In this study, we designed a four-step deep learning approach to classify six (6) histopathological regions and quantitatively evaluated it on the BraTS-Path 2024 challenge dataset, which includes digitized Hematoxylin \& Eosin (H\&E) stained GBM tissue sections annotated for six distinct regions. We used the challenge's publicly available training dataset to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of several variants of EfficientNet architectures (i.e., B0, B1, B2, B3, B4). EfficientNet-B1 and EfficientNet-B4 achieved the best performance, achieving an F1 score of 0.98 in a 5-fold cross-validation configuration using the BraTS-Path training set. The quantitative performance evaluation of our proposed approach with EfficientNet-B1 on the BraTS-Path hold-out validation data and the final hidden testing data yielded F1 scores of 0.546 and 0.517, respectively, for the associated 6-class classification task. The difference in the performance on training, validation, and testing data highlights the challenge of developing models that generalize well to new data, which is crucial for clinical applications. The source code of the proposed approach can be found at the GitHub repository of Indiana University Division of Computational Pathology: https://github.com/IUCompPath/brats-path-2024-enet.